Module 10: RAG Evaluation & Quality Engineering Slides
Slide walkthrough for Module 10 of Production-Grade RAG Systems Engineering: Hallucination detection, retrieval metrics, groundedness scoring, and...
This slide page is the visual review companion for the full course module. Use it to recap the architecture, examples, exercises, production warnings, and takeaways after reading the lesson.
Slide Outline
- RAG Evaluation & Quality Engineering - Hallucination detection, retrieval metrics, groundedness scoring, and evaluation frameworks
- Learning Objectives - 4 outcomes for this module
- Why This Module Matters - Without evaluation, you do not know if your RAG system is improving or degrading. Every change — new model, new chunking
- Retrieval Metrics - Lesson section from the full module
- Groundedness Scoring - Lesson section from the full module
- Hallucination Detection - Lesson section from the full module
- Continuous Evaluation - Lesson section from the full module
- Common Mistakes to Avoid - 4 mistakes covered
- Hands-On Labs - 2 hands-on labs
- Key Takeaways - 5 points to remember
Learning Objectives
- Measure retrieval quality with precision and recall
- Detect and score hallucinations in generated answers
- Build automated evaluation pipelines
- Design continuous quality monitoring for production RAG
Why This Module Matters
Without evaluation, you do not know if your RAG system is improving or degrading. Every change — new model, new chunking, new retrieval — needs measurement. This module gives you the framework to quantify and continuously monitor RAG quality.
Common Mistakes
- Only evaluating end-to-end (cannot tell if retrieval or generation is the problem)
- No test dataset (no way to measure improvement objectively)
- Not automating evaluation (manual review does not scale)
- Ignoring hallucination detection (users lose trust after one wrong answer)
Key Takeaways
- Evaluate retrieval and generation SEPARATELY — bad retrieval causes bad answers
- Precision@K and Recall@K are the most important retrieval metrics
- Groundedness scoring detects hallucinations by checking claims against context
- LLM-as-judge is practical for automated evaluation at scale
- Run evaluation on every change — treat quality as a CI/CD gate
Hands-On Labs
-
Evaluate Retrieval Quality
Measure precision, recall, and MRR on a test dataset.
30 min - Intermediate
- Create a test dataset with queries and expected relevant documents
- Run retrieval and compute precision@5, recall@5, MRR
- Compare metrics across different retrieval strategies
- Identify queries where retrieval fails
-
Build a Hallucination Detection Pipeline
Detect and score hallucinations automatically.
35 min - Advanced
- Implement LLM-as-judge for groundedness scoring
- Run on 50 query-answer pairs
- Build a Grafana dashboard for quality metrics
- Set up alerts for quality threshold violations